Dynamics of in-process control with non-contact air gauges

  • Miroslaw Rucki Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, Poland
Keywords: Dimensional measurement; Air gauging; Time constant; Dynamic error.

Abstract

Dynamic properties of the air gauges performing in-process measurement are of the great importance because of dynamic error affecting the measurement results. The paper presents the analysis of the air gauges dynamics and some practical recommendation. The investigations proved the dependence of the time constants on the actually measured back-pressure. In practical solutions of in-process control, the air gauge must work in conditions of falling back-pressure since with the material removal dimensions of the machined workpiece go down. Thus, in the area of the smallest values of back-pressure within the measuring range, the time constant value is the largest. Worsening of the air gauge dynamic properties at the end stage of the machining must be considered when the dynamic characteristics of the projected air gauge are calculated.

References

Berger, D., Brabandt, D., & Lanza, G. (2015). Conception of a mobile climate simulation chamber for the investigation of the influences of harsh shop floor conditions on in-process measurement systems in machine tools. Measurement, 74, 233–237.

Bokov, V.B. (2011). Pneumatic gauge steady-state modelling by theoretical and empirical methods. Measurement, 44, 303–311.

Cellary, A., & Jermak, Cz.J. (1997). Dynamics of One-Cascade Pneumatic Sensor for the Length Measuring. Optoelectronic and Electronic Sensors, 3054, 36–39.

Curtis, M.A., & Farago, F.T. (2014). Handbook of Dimensional Measurement. (5th ed.). New York: Industrial Press Inc.

Derezynski, J., & Jakubowicz, M. (2016). Verification tests of the air gauges metrological characteristics. Mechanik, 3, 196–199. (in Polish)

Figliola, R.S., & Beasley D.E. (2011). Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements. Clemson University: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Gao, R.D., Tang, X., Gordon, G., & Kazmer, D.O. (2014). Online product qualty monitoring through in-process measurement. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 63(1), 493–496.

Jakubowicz, M. (2020). Accuracy of roundness assessment using air gauge with the slot-shaped measuring nozzle. Measurement, 155, Article 107558.

Jakubowicz, M., & Derezynski, J. (2017). The measuring position designed to determine the metrological properties of air gauges. Advances in Science and Technology Researches, 11(4), 198–205.

Jakubowicz, M., Rucki, M., & Babic, M. (2019). Uncertainty of Sine Input Calibration Apparatus for the Air Gauges. In M. Diering, M. Wieczorowski, & Ch.A. Brown (eds.), Advances in Manufacturing II, Volume 5 – Metrology and Measurement Systems, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 82–94). Cham: Springer, 2019, s. 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18682-1_7

Jakubowicz, M., Rucki, M., & Siemiątkowski, Z. (2019). Computer approximation of air gauge dynamic characteristics using the sine input test rig. MATEC Web of Conferences, 252, Article 02002, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925202002

Jermak, Cz.J, & Rucki, M. (2016). Dynamics of the non-contact roundness measurement with air gages. Acta mechanica et automatica, 10(3), 227–232.

Jermak, Cz.J. (2010). Methods of Shaping the Metrological Characteristics of Air Gages. Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(6), 385–390.

Jermak, Cz.J. (2017). Discussion on flow-through phenomena in the air gauge cascade. Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 11(1), 38–46.

Koehn, Ch. (2014). In-process air gaging. Quality Magazine, 53(5), 22–23.

Koenig, B. (2017). Marriage of convenience. Manufacturing engineering, 158(3), 59–63.

Koscielny, W., & Wozniak, C. (1995). Experimental evaluation of flow models in pneumatic resistances. Proceedings of 9th National Polish Conference PNEUMA-1995, Kielce, Poland, pp. 83–92.

Lotze, W. (1968). Critical assessment and contributions to the development of pneumatic length measurement technology. Habilitation, TU Dresden. (in German)

Majstorovic, V., Stojadinovic, S., Jakovljevic, Z., Zivkovic, S., Djurdjanovic, D., Kostic, J., & Gligorijevic, N. (2018). Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Metrology Model (CPM3) – Big Data Analytics Issue. Procedia CIRP, 72, 503–508.

Majstorovic, V., Zivkovic, S., Djurdjanovic, D., Sabbagh, R., Kvrgic, V., & Gligorijevic, N. (2019). Building of Internet of Things Model for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Metrology Model (CPM3). Procedia CIRP 81, 862–867.

Menzies, I., & Koshy, P. (2009). In-process detection of surface porosity in machined castings. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 49(6), 530–535.

Millimar. Length Metrology Components and Systems. (2005) Catalogue on Dimensional Metrology, Mahr GmbH, Esslingen – Göttingen.

Milo, M.W., Roan, M., & Harris, B. (2015). A new statistical approach to automated quality control in manufacturing processes. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 159–167.

Moroni, G., & Petro, S. (2018). Managing uncertainty in the new manufacturing era. Procedia CIRP, 75, 1–2.

Papananias, M., McLeay, Th.E., Mahfouf, M., & Kadirkamanathan, V. (2019). An Intelligent Metrology Informatics System based on Neural Networks for Multistage Manufacturing Processes. Procedia CIRP, 82, 444–449.

Pogorelov, V.I. (1971). Gasodynamic calculations of the air gauges. Moscow: Mashinostroenie. (in Russian)

Rao, P.S., Jain, P.K., & Dwivedi, D.K. (2017). Optimization of key process parameters on electro chemical honing (ECH) of external cylindrical surfaces of titanium alloy Ti 6Al 4V. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(2 Part A), 2279–2289.

Rucki, M., Barisic, B., & Varga, G. (2010). Air Gauges as a Part of the Dimensional Inspection Systems. Measurement, 43(1), 83–91.

Rucki, M., Jermak, Cz.J. (2012). Dynamic Properties of Small Chamber Air Gages. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1), Article 011001.

Sanchez, M., Exposito, E., & Aguilar, J. (2020). Autonomic computing in manufacturing process coordination in Industry 4.0 context. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 19, Article 100159.

Schuetz, G. (2008). Air Gaging Gets Better with Age. Quality Magazine, 3, 28–32.

Tomov, P., & Dimitrov, L. (2019). The role of digital information models for horizontal and vertical interaction in intelligent production. Facta Universitatis Series: Mechanical Engineering, 17(3), 397–404.

Vacharanukul, K., & Mekid, S. (2005). In-Process dimensional inspection sensors. Measurement, 38(3), 204–218.

Yandayan, T., & Burdekin, M. (1997). In-process dimensional measurement and control of workpiece accuracy. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37(10), 1423–1439.

Załmanzon, W. A. (1971). Teoria elementów stosowanych w technice strumieniowej. Warszawa: WNT. (in Polish)

Zelczak, A. (2002). Pneumatic Length Measurements. Warsaw: WKL. (in Polish)

Published
2020-12-12
How to Cite
Rucki, M. (2020). Dynamics of in-process control with non-contact air gauges. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme200101180r