Comparison of robust optimal QFT controller with TFC and MFC controller in a multi-input multi-output system
Main This paper suggests a practical approach for the development of a stable robot controller using the Quantitative Feedback Principle (QFT). Robot manipulators have a multivariable nonlinear transfer function, the implementation of the QFT method includes, first the conversion of their nonlinear plant into a group linear and uncertain plant set, and then an ideal robust controller for each set have been designed. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm, we show the implementation of the two degrees of freedom manipulator. In the approach provided, the controller has been designed directly by specifying and optimizing the transfer function coefficients using a genetic algorithm. The consistency and limitations of the method are considered to be the restrictions of the problem in the optimization process. System stability and tracking problem are perceived to be the limitations of the system in the optimization process. Non-linear simulations on the tracking problem are carried out and the results illustrate the performance of the controllers. Finally, the controller constructed based on the QFT approach is compared with the TFC and MFC (Fuzzy) controllers and it is shown that the QFT methodology indicates a controller that has increased control efficiency.
Ching Chiou, K. & Shiuh-Jer Huang, Sh. (2005). An adaptive fuzzy controller for robot manipulators, Mechatronics 15, 151–177.
Gharib, M. R., & Daneshvar, A. (2019). Quantitative-fuzzy Controller Design for Multivariable Systems with Uncertainty. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 17(6), 1515-1523.
Gharib, M. R., & Moavenian, M. (2016). Full dynamics and control of a quadrotor using quantitative feedback theory. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 29(3), 501-519.
Gharib, M. R., Dabzadeh, I., Mousavi, S. A. S., & Kamelian, S. (2010). Robust controller design with QFT and sliding mode for boiler pressure. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (pp. 412-417). IEEE.
Gharib, M. R., Kamelian, S., Seyyed Mousavi, S. A., & Dabzadeh, I. (2011). Modelling and multivariable robust controller for a power plant. International Journal of Advanced Mechatronic Systems, 3(2), 119-128.
Gharib, M., & Moavenian, M. (2012). A new generalized controller for engine in idle speed condition. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(7), 6596-6604.
Gharib, M., & Moavenian, M. (2014). Synthesis of robust PID controller for controlling a single input single output system using quantitative feedback theory technique. Scientia Iranica. Transaction B, Mechanical Engineering, 21(6), 1861-1869.
Honari-Torshizi, M., Rahmani, H., Moeinkhah, H., Gharib, M. R., & Jahanpour, J. (2020). A QFT robust controller as a remedy for TRMS. Aviation, 24(4), 137-148.
Horowitz, I M. (1991). Survey of Quantitative Feedback Theory, Int. J. Control Journal, 33(2), 255-261.
Horowitz, I. M. (1992). Quantitative Feedback Design Theory (QFT). 1, QFT Publications, 4470 Grinnel Ave., Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA.
Jahanpour, J., Honari-Torshizi, M., & Gharib, M. R. (2015). VCNC contour following tasks using robust QFT controller. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 39, 131-145.
Jing Lian, R & Fu Lin, B. (2005). Design of a mixed fuzzy controller for multiple-input multiple-output systems, Mechatronics, 15, 1225–1252.
Lewis, F.L. & Et, Al. (1999). Robotics Mechanical Engineering Handbook. Ed. Frank Kreith. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC.
Luh, J. Y. S. (1983) An Anatomy of Industrial Robots and Their Controls, IEEE Trans.Automat. Counter, 28(2), 133-153.
Nataraj, P.S.V. (2002). Computation of QFT Bounds for Robust Tracking Specifications, Elsevier Science Ltd, Automatica, 38, 327-334.
Utkin, V.I. (1977). Variable structure systems with sliding mode: a survey. IEEE Trans Automat Contr; 22, 212–222.